[downloader/f4m] Clarify that we should eventually just implement the DRM scheme (#3000)
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7ff0c6422
commit
d543bdc351
@ -238,13 +238,13 @@ class F4mFD(FileDownloader):
|
||||
doc.findall(_add_ns('drmAdditionalHeaderSet'))):
|
||||
# If id attribute is missing it's valid for all media nodes
|
||||
# without drmAdditionalHeaderId or drmAdditionalHeaderSetId attribute
|
||||
if not 'id' in e.attrib:
|
||||
self.report_error('Media is DRM protected')
|
||||
if 'id' not in e.attrib:
|
||||
self.report_error('Missing ID in f4m DRM')
|
||||
media = list(filter(lambda e: 'drmAdditionalHeaderId' not in e.attrib and
|
||||
'drmAdditionalHeaderSetId' not in e.attrib,
|
||||
media))
|
||||
if not media:
|
||||
self.report_error('Media is DRM protected')
|
||||
self.report_error('Unsupported DRM')
|
||||
return media
|
||||
|
||||
def real_download(self, filename, info_dict):
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user