mirror of
https://github.com/calebstewart/pwncat.git
synced 2024-11-24 01:25:37 +01:00
151 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
151 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
|
# Feature and Changes Ideas
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm just rambling some ideas I have here.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## C2 Channels
|
||
|
|
||
|
I think it could be helpful to establish an abstract C2 channel class
|
||
|
to allow pwncat to communicate over different C2 methods. For example,
|
||
|
`Bind` and `Reverse` channel classes could handle the standard bind and
|
||
|
reverse methods. An `SSH` channel could handle SSH connections.
|
||
|
|
||
|
There is also potential for numerous other methods such as DNS, ICMP,
|
||
|
etc. A Channel class would look a lot like a socket, but would guarantee
|
||
|
a consistent interface across C2 types.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Module access
|
||
|
|
||
|
Modules are currently segmented by type. There are persistence, privilege
|
||
|
escalation, and enumeration modules. These modules are all implemented
|
||
|
independently and accessed through separate commands.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This is helpful for segmenting the different parts of pwncat into different
|
||
|
base goals, but hinders the ease of development for new modules. This
|
||
|
interface does not provide a simple way for complex modules to accept
|
||
|
parameters and forces the developer to remember the interface for all of
|
||
|
these different command frameworks.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I was initially hesitant to adopt the Metasploit Framework way of doing
|
||
|
things where every action was a module, because I wanted to keep things
|
||
|
simpler, but as the framework grows and more complex modules are
|
||
|
implemented, I think this is needed, but needs to be implemented in such
|
||
|
a way that the modules can be interfaced with programmatically as well.
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm thinking of something like this from a programmatic standpoint:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```python
|
||
|
# Attempt all privileg escalation modules
|
||
|
for module in pwncat.modules.match(r"escalate/.*"):
|
||
|
try:
|
||
|
module.run(target=user)
|
||
|
break
|
||
|
except PrivescError:
|
||
|
pass
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Collect facts from all enumeration modules
|
||
|
facts = []
|
||
|
for module in pwncat.modules.match(r"enumerate/.*"):
|
||
|
facts.extend(module.run())
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Install persistence
|
||
|
pwncat.modules.match(r"persist/.*").run(
|
||
|
user = "root",
|
||
|
lhost = "10.0.0.1",
|
||
|
lport = "4444",
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
A module may look something like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```python
|
||
|
class Module(BaseModule):
|
||
|
|
||
|
ARGUMENTS = {
|
||
|
"user": { "type": str, "default": None },
|
||
|
"lhost": { "type": ipaddress.ip_address },
|
||
|
"lport": { "type": int, "default": 4444 }
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
def run(self, user, lhost, lport):
|
||
|
""" Install this persistence method """
|
||
|
return
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
From a REPL point of view, it would look a lot like metasploit. You can
|
||
|
`use` a module. After using a module, any `set` actions would set
|
||
|
configurations for this specific module. If you do not have a module
|
||
|
loaded, then using `set` will set the configuration globally. If a
|
||
|
configuration is not set locally when `run` is executed, then the global
|
||
|
configuration will be checked for matching arguments for the module.
|
||
|
|
||
|
```sh
|
||
|
# Install a persistence mthod with a bind channel
|
||
|
use persistence/system/cron
|
||
|
set method channels/bind
|
||
|
set schedule "* * */1 *"
|
||
|
set lhost 10.0.0.1
|
||
|
set lport 4444
|
||
|
run
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Same as above
|
||
|
run persistence/system/cron method=channels/bind lhost=10.0.0.1 lport=4444
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Set a global configuration, applies to all modules
|
||
|
set -g lhost 10.0.0.1
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
The above programmatic interface could be used to implement the same
|
||
|
automated escalation features we had before.
|
||
|
|
||
|
```python
|
||
|
attempted_modules = []
|
||
|
attempted_users = []
|
||
|
for module in pwncat.modules.match("escalate/.*"):
|
||
|
if module in attempted_modules:
|
||
|
continue
|
||
|
try:
|
||
|
module.run(
|
||
|
user=target_user,
|
||
|
ignore_users=attempted_users,
|
||
|
ignore_modules=[m.name for m in attempted_modules]
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
except PrivescFailed as exc:
|
||
|
attempted_modules.extend(exc.attempted_modules)
|
||
|
attempted_users.extend(exc.attempted_users)
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
The `escalate` modules would be created separately from others. They
|
||
|
would inherit from a `EscalationModule` class, which provides a
|
||
|
standard interface to the `run` method. The subclasses would be
|
||
|
responsible for similar `enumerate`, `escalate`, `write` and `read`
|
||
|
methods that are currently implemented.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This allows an individual privilege escalation method to be run
|
||
|
like this:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```sh
|
||
|
run escalate/sudo user=admin
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
While the standard automated privilege escalation can be accomplished
|
||
|
with a simple:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```sh
|
||
|
use escalate
|
||
|
set user admin
|
||
|
set ignore_module ["sudo"]
|
||
|
run
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Or completely automated for root
|
||
|
run escalate
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
Enumerate possibly valid escalation methods
|
||
|
|
||
|
```sh
|
||
|
# List possibly valid escalation methods to user admin
|
||
|
run escalate/list user=admin
|
||
|
# List possibly valid escalation methods, ignoring the given modules
|
||
|
run escalate/list ignore_module=["sudo"]
|
||
|
```
|