mirror of
https://github.com/yuzu-emu/FasTC.git
synced 2024-11-24 17:45:45 +01:00
225 lines
8.8 KiB
C++
225 lines
8.8 KiB
C++
// Copyright 2008 Google Inc.
|
|
// All Rights Reserved.
|
|
//
|
|
// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
|
|
// met:
|
|
//
|
|
// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
|
|
// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
|
|
// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
|
|
// distribution.
|
|
// * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
|
|
// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
|
|
// this software without specific prior written permission.
|
|
//
|
|
// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
|
// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
|
// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
|
|
// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
|
|
// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
|
|
// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
|
|
// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
|
|
// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
|
|
// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
|
|
// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
|
|
// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
//
|
|
// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
|
|
|
|
// This sample shows how to test common properties of multiple
|
|
// implementations of the same interface (aka interface tests).
|
|
|
|
// The interface and its implementations are in this header.
|
|
#include "prime_tables.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
// First, we define some factory functions for creating instances of
|
|
// the implementations. You may be able to skip this step if all your
|
|
// implementations can be constructed the same way.
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
PrimeTable* CreatePrimeTable();
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
PrimeTable* CreatePrimeTable<OnTheFlyPrimeTable>() {
|
|
return new OnTheFlyPrimeTable;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <>
|
|
PrimeTable* CreatePrimeTable<PreCalculatedPrimeTable>() {
|
|
return new PreCalculatedPrimeTable(10000);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Then we define a test fixture class template.
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
class PrimeTableTest : public testing::Test {
|
|
protected:
|
|
// The ctor calls the factory function to create a prime table
|
|
// implemented by T.
|
|
PrimeTableTest() : table_(CreatePrimeTable<T>()) {}
|
|
|
|
virtual ~PrimeTableTest() { delete table_; }
|
|
|
|
// Note that we test an implementation via the base interface
|
|
// instead of the actual implementation class. This is important
|
|
// for keeping the tests close to the real world scenario, where the
|
|
// implementation is invoked via the base interface. It avoids
|
|
// got-yas where the implementation class has a method that shadows
|
|
// a method with the same name (but slightly different argument
|
|
// types) in the base interface, for example.
|
|
PrimeTable* const table_;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
|
|
|
using testing::Types;
|
|
|
|
// Google Test offers two ways for reusing tests for different types.
|
|
// The first is called "typed tests". You should use it if you
|
|
// already know *all* the types you are gonna exercise when you write
|
|
// the tests.
|
|
|
|
// To write a typed test case, first use
|
|
//
|
|
// TYPED_TEST_CASE(TestCaseName, TypeList);
|
|
//
|
|
// to declare it and specify the type parameters. As with TEST_F,
|
|
// TestCaseName must match the test fixture name.
|
|
|
|
// The list of types we want to test.
|
|
typedef Types<OnTheFlyPrimeTable, PreCalculatedPrimeTable> Implementations;
|
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE(PrimeTableTest, Implementations);
|
|
|
|
// Then use TYPED_TEST(TestCaseName, TestName) to define a typed test,
|
|
// similar to TEST_F.
|
|
TYPED_TEST(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) {
|
|
// Inside the test body, you can refer to the type parameter by
|
|
// TypeParam, and refer to the fixture class by TestFixture. We
|
|
// don't need them in this example.
|
|
|
|
// Since we are in the template world, C++ requires explicitly
|
|
// writing 'this->' when referring to members of the fixture class.
|
|
// This is something you have to learn to live with.
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(-5));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(4));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(6));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(100));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST(PrimeTableTest, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) {
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(3));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(5));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(7));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(11));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(131));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST(PrimeTableTest, CanGetNextPrime) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(2, this->table_->GetNextPrime(0));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(3, this->table_->GetNextPrime(2));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(5, this->table_->GetNextPrime(3));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(7, this->table_->GetNextPrime(5));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(11, this->table_->GetNextPrime(7));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(131, this->table_->GetNextPrime(128));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// That's it! Google Test will repeat each TYPED_TEST for each type
|
|
// in the type list specified in TYPED_TEST_CASE. Sit back and be
|
|
// happy that you don't have to define them multiple times.
|
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
|
|
|
|
#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|
|
|
|
using testing::Types;
|
|
|
|
// Sometimes, however, you don't yet know all the types that you want
|
|
// to test when you write the tests. For example, if you are the
|
|
// author of an interface and expect other people to implement it, you
|
|
// might want to write a set of tests to make sure each implementation
|
|
// conforms to some basic requirements, but you don't know what
|
|
// implementations will be written in the future.
|
|
//
|
|
// How can you write the tests without committing to the type
|
|
// parameters? That's what "type-parameterized tests" can do for you.
|
|
// It is a bit more involved than typed tests, but in return you get a
|
|
// test pattern that can be reused in many contexts, which is a big
|
|
// win. Here's how you do it:
|
|
|
|
// First, define a test fixture class template. Here we just reuse
|
|
// the PrimeTableTest fixture defined earlier:
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
class PrimeTableTest2 : public PrimeTableTest<T> {
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Then, declare the test case. The argument is the name of the test
|
|
// fixture, and also the name of the test case (as usual). The _P
|
|
// suffix is for "parameterized" or "pattern".
|
|
TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(PrimeTableTest2);
|
|
|
|
// Next, use TYPED_TEST_P(TestCaseName, TestName) to define a test,
|
|
// similar to what you do with TEST_F.
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(PrimeTableTest2, ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes) {
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(-5));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(0));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(1));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(4));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(6));
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(this->table_->IsPrime(100));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(PrimeTableTest2, ReturnsTrueForPrimes) {
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(2));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(3));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(5));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(7));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(11));
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(this->table_->IsPrime(131));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
TYPED_TEST_P(PrimeTableTest2, CanGetNextPrime) {
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(2, this->table_->GetNextPrime(0));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(3, this->table_->GetNextPrime(2));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(5, this->table_->GetNextPrime(3));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(7, this->table_->GetNextPrime(5));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(11, this->table_->GetNextPrime(7));
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(131, this->table_->GetNextPrime(128));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Type-parameterized tests involve one extra step: you have to
|
|
// enumerate the tests you defined:
|
|
REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(
|
|
PrimeTableTest2, // The first argument is the test case name.
|
|
// The rest of the arguments are the test names.
|
|
ReturnsFalseForNonPrimes, ReturnsTrueForPrimes, CanGetNextPrime);
|
|
|
|
// At this point the test pattern is done. However, you don't have
|
|
// any real test yet as you haven't said which types you want to run
|
|
// the tests with.
|
|
|
|
// To turn the abstract test pattern into real tests, you instantiate
|
|
// it with a list of types. Usually the test pattern will be defined
|
|
// in a .h file, and anyone can #include and instantiate it. You can
|
|
// even instantiate it more than once in the same program. To tell
|
|
// different instances apart, you give each of them a name, which will
|
|
// become part of the test case name and can be used in test filters.
|
|
|
|
// The list of types we want to test. Note that it doesn't have to be
|
|
// defined at the time we write the TYPED_TEST_P()s.
|
|
typedef Types<OnTheFlyPrimeTable, PreCalculatedPrimeTable>
|
|
PrimeTableImplementations;
|
|
INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(OnTheFlyAndPreCalculated, // Instance name
|
|
PrimeTableTest2, // Test case name
|
|
PrimeTableImplementations); // Type list
|
|
|
|
#endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
|