Update after Simon's comment

Update the comment with Simon's comments
This commit is contained in:
Ron Eldor 2017-07-24 13:28:48 +03:00 committed by Simon Butcher
parent 4b53513db5
commit 05b9498d94
2 changed files with 10 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -8,16 +8,17 @@ Note: This is just a template, so feel free to use/remove the unnecessary things
## Bug
**OS**
linux|windows|??
mbed-OS|linux|windows|
**mbed TLS build:**
Version: x.x.x or git commit id
Configuration: please attach config.h file
OS version: x.x.x
Configuration: please attach config.h file where possible
Compiler and options (if you used a pre-built binary, please indicate how you obtained it):
Additional environment information:
**peer device TLS stack and version**
openSSL | GnuTls | other
openSSL|GnuTls|Chrome|NSS(Firefox)|SEcureChannel (IIS/Internet Explorer/Edge)|Other
version:
**Expected behavior**
@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ version:
----------------------------------------------------------------
## Enhancement\Feature Request
**Incentive for change**
**Justification - why does the library need this feature?**
**Suggested enhancement**

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Notes:
* Pull requests will not be accepted until:
* Pull requests cannot be accepted until:
- The submitter has [accepted the online agreement here with a click through](https://developer.mbed.org/contributor_agreement/)
or those that do not wish to create an mbed account, a slightly different agreement can be found [here](https://www.mbed.com/en/about-mbed/contributor-license-agreements/)
or for companies or those that do not wish to create an mbed account, a slightly different agreement can be found [here](https://www.mbed.com/en/about-mbed/contributor-license-agreements/)
- The PR follows the [mbed TLS coding standards](https://tls.mbed.org/kb/development/mbedtls-coding-standards)
* This is just a template, so feel free to use/remove the unnecessary things
## Description
@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ legacy supported branches will not be backported if:
- This PR contains changes in the API. If this is true, and there is a need for the fix to be backported, the fix should be handled differently in the legacy branch
Yes | NO
What branch?
Which branch?
## Migrations
If there is any API change, what's the incentive and logic for it.