Add a new key pair object type: MBEDTLS_PK_OPAQUE, intended for
implementations of asymmetric cryptography operations that call an
external cryptographic module.
External cryptographic module engines must implement the API described
by a mbedtls_pk_info_t structure and, usually, a custom setup function.
Document the fields of the mbedtls_pk_info_t structure and the
requirements on a PK engine. Also document non-obvious aspects of the
behavior of the pk interface functions on opaque keys.
Change the interface of check_pair_func to take a pointer to a full
mbedtls_pk_context as its pub argument, and not just the data part of
the context. This is necessary because when prv is opaque, pub may
legitimately be of a different type (typically prv would be opaque and
pub would be transparent).
This is in preparation to adding support for opaque keys in the pk layer. The
header files are for use as follows:
* pk.h for users of the pk interface.
* pk_info.h for implementers of opaque key engines.
* pk_internal.h only inside libmbedcrypto to implement built-in pk types.
Expose a function mbedtls_pk_signature_size to calculate the maximum
size of a signature made with a given key. Document that this is the
buffer size that mbedtls_pk_sign requires.
Add a corresponding field signature_size_func to the mbedtls_pk_info
structure.
In the mbedtls_pk_info_t method can_do, pass the context data. This
will be needed for opaque keys, where the info structure depends on
the method to access the opaque key and not on the key type.
There were preprocessor directives in pk.c and pk_wrap.c that cheked
whether the bit length of size_t was greater than that of unsigned int.
However, the check relied on the MBEDTLS_HAVE_INT64 macro being defined
which is not directly related to size_t. This might result in errors in
some platforms. This change modifies the check to use the macros
SIZE_MAX and UINT_MAX instead making the code more robust.
This patch introduces some additional checks in the PK module for 64-bit
systems only. The problem is that the API functions in the PK
abstraction accept a size_t value for the hashlen, while the RSA module
accepts an unsigned int for the hashlen. Instead of silently casting
size_t to unsigned int, this change checks whether the hashlen overflows
an unsigned int and returns an error.