Introduce MBEDTLS_X509_INFO to indicate the availability of the
mbedtls_x509_*_info() function and closely related APIs. When this is
not defined, also omit name and description from
mbedtls_oid_descriptor_t, and omit OID arrays, macros, and types that
are entirely unused. This saves several KB of code space.
Change-Id: I056312613379890e0d70e1d08c34171287c0aa17
In a reduced configuration without PEM, PKCS5 or PKCS12, armc5 found that ret
was set but not used. Fixing that lead to a new warning about the variable not
being used at all. Now the variable is only declared when it's needed.
Only effective together with --rom, makes two changes:
- abort in case of build warnings
- skip writing statistics
The goal is to make sure we build cleanly in the configuration used for
measuring code size, with all the compilers we use, both because we care about
that configuration and those compilers, and because any warnings would cast a
shadow on the code size measurements.
Currently the build fails with armc5 due to a pre-existing warning in PK, this
will be fixed in the next commit.
The next commit will also add an all.sh component to make sure we have no
regression in the future. (Which is the motivation for --check skipping
statistics: an all.sh component should probably not leave files around.)
While at it, fix two things:
1. The call to gcc --version was redundant with the echo line below
2. WARNING_CFLAGS shouldn't be overriden with armclang, as it would remove the
-Wall -Wextra and any directory-specific warning (such as
-Wdeclaration-after-statement in library). It's meant to be overriden only
with compilers that don't accept the default value (namely armc5 here).
Some TLS-only code paths were not protected by an #ifdef and while some
compiler are happy to just silently remove them, armc5 complains:
Warning: #111-D: statement is unreachable
Let's make armc5 happy.
This is enabled by default as we generally enable things by default unless
there's a reason not to (experimental, deprecated, security risk).
We need a compile-time option because, even though the functions themselves
can be easily garbage-collected by the linker, implementing them will require
saving 64 bytes of Client/ServerHello.random values after the handshake, that
would otherwise not be needed, and people who don't need this feature
shouldn't have to pay the price of increased RAM usage.
With the change to the full config, there were no longer any tests
that exercise invalid-parameter behavior. The test suite exercises
invalid-parameter behavior by calling TEST_INVALID_PARAM and friends,
relying on the test suite's mbedtls_check_param function. This
function is only enabled if MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS is defined but not
MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS_ASSERT.
Add a component to all.sh that enables MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS but
disables MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS_ASSERT and doesn't define
MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED. This way, the xxx_invalid_param() tests do run.
Since sample programs don't provide a mbedtls_check_param function,
this component doesn't build the sample programs.
All sample and test programs had a definition of mbedtls_param_failed.
This was necessary because we wanted to be able to build them in a
configuration with MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS set but without a definition
of MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED. Now that we activate the sample definition of
MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED in config.h when testing with
MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS set, this boilerplate code is no longer needed.
Introduce a new configuration option MBEDTLS_CHECK_PARAMS_ASSERT,
which is disabled by default. When this option is enabled,
MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED defaults to assert rather than to a call to
mbedtls_param_failed, and <assert.h> is included.
This fixes#2671 (no easy way to make MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED assert)
without breaking backward compatibility. With this change,
`config.pl full` runs tests with MBEDTLS_PARAM_FAILED set to assert,
so the tests will fail if a validation check fails, and programs don't
need to provide their own definition of mbedtls_param_failed().
Don't use the macro name assert. It's technically permitted as long as
<assert.h> is not included, but it's fragile, because it means the
code and any header that it includes must not include <assert.h>.
For unit tests and sample programs, CFLAGS=-m32 is enough to get a
32-bit build, because these programs are all compiled directly
from *.c to the executable in one shot. But with makefile rules that
first build object files and then link them, LDFLAGS=-m32 is also
needed.
A positive option looks better, but comes with the following compatibility
issue: people using a custom config.h that is not based on the default
config.h and need TLS support would need to manually change their config in
order to still get TLS.
Work around that by making the public option negative. Internally the positive
option is used, though.
In the future (when preparing the next major version), we might want to switch
back to a positive option as this would be more consistent with other options
we have.
If int is not capable of storing as many values as unsigned, the code
may generate a trap value. If signed int and unsigned int aren't
32-bit types, the code may calculate meaningless values.
The elements of the HAVEGE state are manipulated with bitwise
operations, with the expectations that the elements are 32-bit
unsigned integers (or larger). But they are declared as int, and so
the code has undefined behavior. Clang with Asan correctly points out
some shifts that reach the sign bit.
Use unsigned int internally. This is technically an aliasing violation
since we're accessing an array of `int` via a pointer to `unsigned
int`, but since we don't access the array directly inside the same
function, it's very unlikely to be compiled in an unintended manner.
