Mbed TLS version 2.14.0
Resolved conflicts in include/mbedtls/config.h,
tests/scripts/check-files.py, and yotta/create-module.sh by removing yotta.
Resolved conflicts in tests/.jenkins/Jenkinsfile by continuing to run
mbedtls-psa job.
There was no test case of ECDH with anything other than
PSA_ALG_SELECT_RAW. Exercise the code path from ECDH through a
"proper" KDF.
ECDH shared secret copied from an existing test, HKDF output
calculated with Cryptodome.
If psa_key_derivation_internal() fails, it's up to the caller to clean
up. Do this, and add a note at the top of
psa_key_derivation_internal() and its auxiliary functions.
There is no non-regression test because at the moment the only way to
trigger an error is a borderline low-memory condition and we don't
have the means to trigger this.
Add missing checks for defined(MBEDTLS_MD_C) around types and
functions that require it (HMAC, HKDF, TLS12_PRF).
Add missing checks for defined(MBEDTLS_ECDSA_DETERMINISTIC) around
code that calls mbedtls_ecdsa_sign_det().
Add missing checks for defined(MBEDTLS_ECDH_C) around ECDH-specific
functions.
The standard prohibits calling memcpy() with NULL pointer
arguments, even if the size argument is 0.
The TLS-1.2 PRF generator setup function previously called
memcpy() with the label and salt as the source, even if
they were of length 0, as exercised by the derive_key_policy
test case in the PSA crypto test suite.
This commit adds guards around the memcpy() calls so that they
are only executed of salt or label have positive length, respectively.
This commit adds KDF algorithm identifiers `PSA_ALG_TLS12_PRF(HASH)`
to the PSA crypto API. They represent the key derivation functions
used by TLS 1.2 for the PreMasterSecret->MasterSecret and
MasterSecret->KeyBlock conversions.
Use m for the bit size of the field order, not q which is
traditionally the field order.
Correct and clarify the private key representation format as has been
done for the private key and ECDH shared secret formats.
The endianness actually depends on the curve type.
Correct the terminology around "curve size" and "order of the curve".
I tried to find a formulation that is comprehensible to programmers
who do not know the underlying mathematics, but nonetheless correct
and precise.
Use similar terminology in other places that were using "order of the
curve" to describe the bit size associated with the curve.
In psa_key_agreement_ecdh, check that the public key is on the same
curve as the private key. The underlying mbedtls API doesn't check.
If the curves don't match, psa_key_agreement_ecdh is practically
guaranteed to return INVALID_ARGUMENT anyway, because way the code is
written, the public point is interpreted on the curve of the private
point, and it is rejected because the point is not on the curve. This
is why the test case "PSA key agreement setup: ECDH, raw: public key
on different curve" passed even before adding this check.
In ECDH key agreement, allow a public key with the OID id-ECDH, not
just a public key with the OID id-ecPublicKey.
Public keys with the OID id-ECDH are not permitted by psa_import_key,
at least for now. There would be no way to use the key for a key
agreement operation anyway in the current API.
Add test cases that do key agreement with raw selection in pieces, to
validate that selection works even when the application doesn't read
everything in one chunk.
psa_key_derivation requires the caller to specify a maximum capacity.
This commit adds a special value that indicates that the maximum
capacity should be the maximum supported by the algorithm. This is
currently meant only for selection algorithms used on the shared
secret produced by a key agreement.
