aria.c has a shift by 3 bytes, but does not use the 0xff masking.
aparently this is not a problem and it is tidier to use the maco.
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Imrpoved the descriptions of the macros and parameters and
changing the name of the MBEDTLS_PUT_UINT... macro parameters
to be more descriptive
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
These cast to an unsigned char rather than a uint8_t
like with MBEDTLS_BYTE_x
These save alot of space and will improve maintence by
replacing the appropriate code with MBEDTLS_CHAR_x
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
The GET macros used to write to a macro parameter, but now
they can be used to assign a value to the desired variable
rather than pass it in as an argument and have it modified
in the macro function.
Due to this MBEDTLS_BYTES_TO_U32_LE is the same as
MBEDTLS_GET_UINT32_LE and was there for replaced in the
appropriate files and removed from common.h
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Added documenttion comments to common.h and removed the changelog
as it is not really necessary for refactoring.
Also modified a comment in aria.c to be clearer
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
Although these only appear in one file: psa_crypto_storage.c
it is tidy to give it the same prefix as the UINT32 macros
and to store them in the fame file
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
As per tests/scripts/check-names.sh, macros in
library/ header files should be prefixed with
MBEDTLS_
The macro functions in common.h where also indented
to comply with the same test
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
The use of the BYTE_x macro in nist_kw did not seem appropriate
in hind sight as it is working with a character array not an int
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
missed do-while around function-like macros (UINT32_BE and
UINT_LE macros) originally present in the indivdual files,
before being moved to common.h.
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
32-bit integer manipulation macros (little edian):
GET_UINT32_LE and PUT_UINT32_LE appear in several
files in library/.
Removes duplicate code and save vertical
space the macro has been moved to common.h.
Improves maintainability.
Also provided brief comment in common.h for
BYTES_TO_U32_LE. comment/documentation will
probably need to be edited further for all
recent additions to library/common.h
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
32-bit integer manipulation macros (big edian):
GET_UINT32_BE and PUT_UINT32_BE appear in several
files in library/.
Removes duplicate code and save vertical
space the macro has been moved to common.h.
Improves maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
The macro BYTES_TO_U32_LE appears in poly1305.c and
chacha20.c.
Removes duplicate code and save vertical
space the macro has been moved to common.h.
Improves maintainability.
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
To improve readability by saving horizontal and vertical space.
Removed unecessary & 0xFF.
Byte reading macros implemented in library/common.h, All files
containing "& 0xff" were modified.
Comments/Documentation not yet added to the macro definitions.
Fixes#4274
Signed-off-by: Joe Subbiani <joe.subbiani@arm.com>
The function `pk_hashlen_helper` exists to ensure a valid hash_len is
used in pk_verify and pk_sign functions. This function has been
used to adjust to the corrsponding hash_len if the user passes in 0
for the hash_len argument based on the md algorithm given. If the user
does not pass in 0 as the hash_len, then it is not adjusted. This is
problematic if the user gives a hash_len and hash buffer that is less than the
associated length of the md algorithm. This error would go unchecked
and eventually lead to buffer overread when given to specific pk_sign/verify
functions, since they both ignore the hash_len argument if md_alg is not MBEDTLS_MD_NONE.
This commit, adds a conditional to `pk_hashlen_helper` so that an
error is thrown if the user specifies a hash_length (not 0) and it is
not equal to the expected for the associated message digest algorithm.
This aligns better with the api documentation where it states "If
hash_len is 0, then the length associated with md_alg is used instead,
or an error returned if it is invalid"
Signed-off-by: Nick Child <nick.child@ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>
These macros were moved into a header and now check-names.sh is failing.
Add an MBEDTLS_ prefix to the macro names to make it pass.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
We were already rejecting them at the end, due to the fact that with the
usual (x, z) formulas they lead to the result (0, 0) so when we want to
normalize at the end, trying to compute the modular inverse of z will
give an error.
If we wanted to support those points, we'd a special case in
ecp_normalize_mxz(). But it's actually permitted by all sources (RFC
7748 say we MAY reject 0 as a result) and recommended by some to reject
those points (either to ensure contributory behaviour, or to protect
against timing attack when the underlying field arithmetic is not
constant-time).
Since our field arithmetic is indeed not constant-time, let's reject
those points before they get mixed with sensitive data (in
ecp_mul_mxz()), in order to avoid exploitable leaks caused by the
special cases they would trigger. (See the "May the Fourth" paper
https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/806.pdf)
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Clang was complaining and check-names.sh too
This only duplicates macros, so no impact on code size. In 3.0 we can
probably avoid the duplication by using an internal header under
library/ but this won't work for 2.16.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We were already rejecting them at the end, due to the fact that with the
usual (x, z) formulas they lead to the result (0, 0) so when we want to
normalize at the end, trying to compute the modular inverse of z will
give an error.
If we wanted to support those points, we'd a special case in
ecp_normalize_mxz(). But it's actually permitted by all sources
(RFC 7748 say we MAY reject 0 as a result) and recommended by some to
reject those points (either to ensure contributory behaviour, or to
protect against timing attack when the underlying field arithmetic is
not constant-time).
Since our field arithmetic is indeed not constant-time, let's reject
those points before they get mixed with sensitive data (in
ecp_mul_mxz()), in order to avoid exploitable leaks caused by the
special cases they would trigger. (See the "May the Fourth" paper
https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/806.pdf)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
