When parsing a certificate with the basic constraints extension
the max_pathlen that was read from it was incremented regardless
of its value. However, if the max_pathlen is equal to INT_MAX (which
is highly unlikely), an undefined behaviour would occur.
This commit adds a check to ensure that such value is not accepted
as valid. Relevant tests for INT_MAX and INT_MAX-1 are also introduced.
Certificates added in this commit were generated using the
test_suite_x509write, function test_x509_crt_check. Input data taken
from the "Certificate write check Server1 SHA1" test case, so the generated
files are like the "server1.crt", but with the "is_ca" field set to 1 and
max_pathlen as described by the file name.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Kurek <andrzej.kurek@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Nowicki <piotr.nowicki@arm.com>
When building with MBEDTLS_MEMORY_DEBUG enabled, and running the ecdh part,
the benchmark program would start writing a very large number of space
characters on stdout, and would have to be killed because it never seemed to
terminate.
This was due to an integer overflow in computing how many space to leave after
the title in order to get memory measurements aligned, which resulted in up
to SIZE_MAX spaces being printed.
This commit just fixes the overflow, the next commit is going to fix the magic
number (12).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
If we disable or enable a message locally, it's by design. There's no
need to clutter the Pylint output with this information.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
If we take the trouble of using pass, it's because we think the code
is clearer that way. For example, Pylint 2.4 rejects pass in
def foo():
"""Do nothing."""
pass
But relying on a docstring as the sole code is weird, hence the use of
pass.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Simplify the code in minor ways. Each of this changes fixes a warning
from Pylint 2.4 that doesn't appear with Pylint 1.7.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Python 2 is no longer supported upstream. Actively drop compatibility
with Python 2.
Removing the inheritance of a class on object pacifies recent versions
of Pylint (useless-object-inheritance).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Pylint warns about things like ``log.info('...'.format(...))``.
It insists on ``log.info('...', ...)``.
This is of minor utility (mainly a performance gain when there are
many messages that use formatting and are below the log level).
Some versions of Pylint (including 1.8, which is the version on
Ubuntu 18.04) only recognize old-style format strings using '%',
and complain about something like ``log.info('{}', foo)`` with
logging-too-many-args (Pylint supports new-style formatting if
declared globally with logging_format_style under [LOGGING] but
this requires Pylint >=2.2).
Disable this warning to remain compatible with Pylint 1.8 and not have
to change abi_check.py to use %-formats instead of {}-formats when
logging.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
check_python_files was optional in all.sh because we used to have CI
machines where pylint wasn't available. But this had the downside that
check_python_files kept breaking because it wasn't checked in the CI.
Now our CI has pylint and check_python_files should not be optional.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
On some systems, such as Ubuntu up to 19.04, `pylint` is for Python 2
and `pylint3` is for Python 3, so we should not use `pylint` even if
it's available.
Use the Python module instead of the trivial shell wrapper. This way
we can make sure to use the correct Python version.
Fix#3111
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Don't mix Windows and Unix line endings, it's the worst of both worlds.
Update the Visual Studio templates and regenerate the generated files.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Use CRLF consistently instead of cobbling a \r here and a \n there.
The generated files don't change.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Check Windows files for some issues, including permissions. Omit the
checks related to special characters (whitespace, line endings,
encoding) as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
To test a file name exactly, prepend a / to the base name.
files_to_check actually checks suffixes, not file names, so rename it
to extensions_to_check.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The identifiers of the unmet dependencies of a test case are
stored in a buffer of fixed size that can be potentially too
small to store all the unmet dependencies. Indicate in test
reports if some unmet dependencies are missing.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Fix potential buffer overflow when tracking the unmet dependencies
of a test case. The identifiers of unmet dependencies are stored
in an array of fixed size. Ensure that we don't overrun the array.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Use size_t for some variables that are array indices.
Use unsigned for some variables that are counts of "small" things.
This is a backport of commit 3c1c8ea3e7.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Adding .function was necessary, as otherwise ctags would have no idea what to
do with those files.
Adding .h may not be necessary, as by default ctags considers them C++ which
is probably good enough, but since we're tuning the mapping anyway...
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
See the comments in the code for how an attack would go, and the ChangeLog
entry for an impact assessment. (For ECDSA, leaking a few bits of the scalar
over several signatures translates to full private key recovery using a
lattice attack.)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The current logging was sub-standard, in particular there was no trace
whatsoever of the HelloVerifyRequest being sent. Now it's being logged with
the usual levels: 4 for full content, 2 return of f_send, 1 decision about
sending it (or taking other branches in the same function) because that's the
same level as state changes in the handshake, and also same as the "possible
client reconnect" message" to which it's the logical continuation (what are we
doing about it?).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
