Given the PSA_WANT_* config options added lately,
update set_psa_test_dependencies.py and run it
on test_suite_psa_crypto*.data files but the SE
and generated ones.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Replace manually written dependencies on MBEDTLS_xxx with
PSA_WANT_xxx dependencies that are determined automatically from the
test data.
Run tests/scripts/set_psa_test_dependencies.py on
tests/suites/test_suite_psa_crypto*.data,
except for the dynamic secure element tests in
tests/suites/test_suite_psa_crypto_se_driver_hal*.data.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
PSA_ALG_ECB_NO_PADDING came in to the PSA Crypto API spec v1.0.0, but
was not implemented yet in the mbed TLS implementation.
Signed-off-by: Steven Cooreman <steven.cooreman@silabs.com>
Rename PSA_DH_GROUP_xxx to PSA_DH_FAMILY_xxx, also rename
PSA_KEY_TYPE_GET_GROUP to PSA_KEY_TYPE_DH_GET_FAMILY and rename
psa_dh_group_t to psa_dh_family_t. Old defines are provided in
include/crypto_compat.h for backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
Rename PSA_ECC_CURVE_xxx to PSA_ECC_FAMILY_xxx, also rename
PSA_KEY_TYPE_GET_CURVE to PSA_KEY_TYPE_ECC_GET_FAMILY and rename
psa_ecc_curve_t to psa_ecc_family_t. Old defines are provided in
include/crypto_compat.h for backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@arm.com>
The metadata tests depend on the corresponding feature because there
is no guarantee that the metadata is correct if the feature is
disabled. There are metadata test cases for some algorithms and key
types that are declared but not supported. These test cases are
present but can never run.
It is debatable whether having these test cases is a good thing in
case they become runnable in the future, or a bad thing because
they're dead code. We're working on detecting test cases that are
never executed for accidental reasons (e.g. typo in a dependency or
missing configuration on the CI), and having test cases that are
deliberately never executed messes this up. So remove these test
cases. If we do implement the corresponding feature, it'll be easy to
add the corresponding metadata test cases.
The features that had metadata tests but no implementations were:
* SHA-512/256 and SHA-512/224 (hypothetical dependency: MBEDTLS_SHA512_256)
* DSA (hypothetical dependency: MBEDTLS_DSA_C)
* SHA-3 and HMAC-SHA-3 (hypothetical dependency: MBEDTLS_SHA3_C)
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Define constants for ECC curve families and DH group families. These
constants have 0x0000 in the lower 16 bits of the key type.
Support these constants in the implementation and in the PSA metadata
tests.
Switch the slot management and secure element driver HAL tests to the
new curve encodings. This requires SE driver code to become slightly
more clever when figuring out the bit-size of an imported EC key since
it now needs to take the data size into account.
Switch some documentation to the new encodings.
Remove the macro PSA_ECC_CURVE_BITS which can no longer be implemented.
Make check-test-cases.py pass.
Prior to this commit, there were many repeated test descriptions, but
none with the same test data and dependencies and comments, as checked
with the following command:
for x in tests/suites/*.data; do perl -00 -ne 'warn "$ARGV: $. = $seen{$_}\n" if $seen{$_}; $seen{$_}=$.' $x; done
Wherever a test suite contains multiple test cases with the exact same
description, add " [#1]", " [#2]", etc. to make the descriptions
unique. We don't currently use this particular arrangement of
punctuation, so all occurrences of " [#" were added by this script.
I used the following ad hoc code:
import sys
def fix_test_suite(data_file_name):
in_paragraph = False
total = {}
index = {}
lines = None
with open(data_file_name) as data_file:
lines = list(data_file.readlines())
for line in lines:
if line == '\n':
in_paragraph = False
continue
if line.startswith('#'):
continue
if not in_paragraph:
# This is a test case description line.
total[line] = total.get(line, 0) + 1
index[line] = 0
in_paragraph = True
with open(data_file_name, 'w') as data_file:
for line in lines:
if line in total and total[line] > 1:
index[line] += 1
line = '%s [#%d]\n' % (line[:-1], index[line])
data_file.write(line)
for data_file_name in sys.argv[1:]:
fix_test_suite(data_file_name)
Parametrize finite-field Diffie-Hellman key types with a DH group
identifier, in the same way elliptic curve keys are parametrized with
an EC curve identifier.
Define the DH groups from the TLS registry (these are the groups from
RFC 7919).
Replicate the macro definitions and the metadata tests from elliptic
curve identifiers to DH group identifiers.
Define PSA_DH_GROUP_CUSTOM as an implementation-specific extension for
which domain parameters are used to specify the group.
Declare algorithms for ChaCha20 and ChaCha20-Poly1305, and a
corresponding (common) key type.
Don't declare Poly1305 as a separate algorithm because it's a one-time
authenticator, not a MAC, so the API isn't suitable for it (no way to
use a nonce).
Change the key derivation API to take inputs in multiple steps,
instead of a single one-site-fits-poorly function.
Conflicts:
* include/psa/crypto.h: merge independent changes in the documentation
of psa_key_agreement (public_key from the work on public key formats
vs general description and other parameters in the work on key derivation).
* tests/suites/test_suite_psa_crypto.data: update the key agreement
tests from the work on key derivation to the format from the work on
public key formats.
* tests/suites/test_suite_psa_crypto_metadata.function: reconcile the
addition of unrelated ALG_IS_xxx macros
Get rid of "key selection" algorithms (of which there was only one:
raw key selection).
Encode key agreement by combining a raw key agreement with a KDF,
rather than passing the KDF as an argument of a key agreement macro.
You can use PSA_ALG_ANY_HASH to build the algorithm value for a
hash-and-sign algorithm in a policy. Then the policy allows usage with
this hash-and-sign family with any hash.
Test that PSA_ALG_ANY_HASH-based policies allow a specific hash, but
not a different hash-and-sign family. Test that PSA_ALG_ANY_HASH is
not valid for operations, only in policies.
Test for a subclass of public-key algorithm: those that perform
full-domain hashing, i.e. algorithms that can be broken down as
sign(key, hash(message)).
A key selection algorithm is similar to a key derivation algorithm in
that it takes a secret input and produces a secret output stream.
However, unlike key derivation algorithms, there is no expectation
that the input cannot be reconstructed from the output. Key selection
algorithms are exclusively meant to be used on the output of a key
agreement algorithm to select chunks of the shared secret.
If some algorithms are excluded in the build, it's ok for the corresponding
macros not to give the correct results. Therefore the corresponding test cases
should depend on the implementation of the algorithm. For example, it's ok for
PSA_HASH_MAX_SIZE to be less than PSA_HASH_SIZE(PSA_ALG_SHA_512) if we build
without SHA-512 support, and we indeed do this. It's even ok for an
implementation to return 0 for PSA_ALG_IS_HASH(PSA_ALG_SHA_512) if it doesn't
support SHA-512; we return 1 anyway but the tests are less
implementation-specific if we don't enforce it.
This commit adds dependencies on symbols that don't exist in Mbed TLS,
for algorithms that Mbed TLS doesn't implement. These are:
MBEDTLS_SHA512_256 for SHA-512/256, MBEDTLS_SHA3_C for SHA-3,
MBEDTLS_DSA_C and MBEDTLS_DSA_DETERMINISTIC for DSA, and
MBEDTLS_ECP_DP_xxx_ENABLED for elliptic curves that have a PSA
encoding but are not supported in Mbed TLS.
For all key types, validate feature test macros (PSA_KEY_TYPE_IS_xxx).
For asymmetric keys (public key or key pair), validate the
corresponding public/pair type.
For ECC keys, validate GET_CURVE.
For all algorithms, validate feature test macros (PSA_ALG_IS_xxx).
For hash algorithms, validate the exact hash size, and validate
xxx_GET_HASH macros on dependent algorithms.
For MAC algorithms, validate the MAC size. For AEAD algorithms,
validate the tag size.
There is a separate test case for each HMAC algorithm, which is
necessary because each has its own MAC size. For other hash-dependent
algorithms, there is no interesting variation to test here, so only
one hash gets tested.
