PSA_WANT_xxx is useful regardless of how the symbols are defined:
explicitly (with MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG) or implicitly (without
MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Move all the PSA crypto APIs using key handles
to use key identifiers but psa_key_open() and
psa_key_close(). This is done without modifying
any test as key handles and key identifiers are
now the same.
Update the library modules using PSA crypto APIs
to get rid of key handles.
Programs and unit tests are updated to not use
key handles in subsequent commits, not in this
one.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Without MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_CONFIG, PSA_WANT_xxx needs to be defined,
for the sake of code that calls the PSA API (TLS code, tests, sample
apps).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
* Stores bits in psa_persistent_key_storage_format.
* psa_load_persistent_key_into_slot still imports plaintext keys which
ensures that the bits value gets set.
* Updates key specification to match new implementation.
* Expands persistent store and load tests with to check for bits
attribute.
* Removes bits storage from psa_se_key_data_storage_t.
Signed-off-by: Torstein Nesse <torstein.nesse@silabs.com>
With PSA crypto v1.0.0, a volatile key identifier may
contain a owner identifier but no file is associated
to it. Thus rename the type psa_key_file_id_t to
mbedtls_svc_key_id_t to avoid a direct link with a
file when a key identifier involves an owner
identifier.
The new type name is prefixed by mbedtls to highlight
that the type is specific to Mbed TLS implementation
and not defined in the PSA Cryptography API
specification.
The svc in the type name stands for service as this
is the key identifier type from the point of view of
the service providing the Cryptography services.
The service can be completely provided by the present
library or partially in case of a multi-client service.
As a consequence rename as well:
. MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_KEY_FILE_ID_ENCODES_OWNER to
MBEDTLS_PSA_CRYPTO_KEY_ID_ENCODES_OWNER
. PSA_KEY_ID_INIT to MBEDTLS_SVC_KEY_ID_INIT
. PSA_KEY_FILE_GET_KEY_ID to MBEDTLS_SVC_KEY_ID_GET_KEY_ID
. psa_key_file_id_make to mbedtls_svc_key_id_make
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Proposed specification for conditional inclusion of cryptographic
mechanism through the PSA API in Mbed TLS.
The inclusion of a mechanism is based on a declaration of boolean
symbols by the application. There is a symbol for each key type or
parametrized key type constructor, and for each algorithm or
parametrized algorithm constructor.
This is work in progress, presented for a first design discussion.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
There is little point in leaving the order in which drivers are
considered unspecified. This gives flexibility to the implementation
for a process that is generally performed at build time, not in a
constrained environment. Having a well-defined order is especially
useful with fallback.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
It's ok if they map to the same function names and an error otherwise.
It's an error to have multiple opaque drivers for the same location.
If multiple transparent drivers apply, which one applies is unspecified.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The existing description of the syntax of capabilities also describes
the semantics of each property, but the semantics of the capability as
a whole is not immediately clear. Add a subsection that explains
precisely when a capability is applicable.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Inferring entry points from algorithms is nice in that it makes
capability specifications shorter and less redundant, but that's not
really important. It also makes capabilities more fragile: if the core
starts supporting new mechanisms based on the same algorithm (for
example, adding hash-and-sign when only sign-the-hash existed before),
a driver only supporting the old mechanisms would fail at build time.
So make entry points mandatory.
This has the benefit of making the semantics of capabilities easier to
describe.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Add the mention of key_derivation_output_key in the section about the
key derivation entry point family.
Rename "derive_key" to "key_derivation_output_key". At this point,
there's no reason to deviate from the naming convention.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Clarify some sentences. There is no change in intended meaning.
Fix typos. Change British spelling to American spelling.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
