The test suites `test_suite_gcm.aes{128,192,256}_en.data` contains
numerous NIST test vectors for AES-*-GCM against which the GCM
API mbedtls_gcm_xxx() is tested.
However, one level higher at the cipher API, no tests exist which
exercise mbedtls_cipher_auth_{encrypt/decrypt}() for GCM ciphers,
although test_suite_cipher.function contains the test auth_crypt_tv
which does precisely that and is already used e.g. in
test_suite_cipher.ccm.
This commit replicates the test vectors from
test_suite_gcm.aes{128,192,256}_en.data in test_suite_cipher.gcm.data
and adds a run of auth_crypt_tv for each of them.
The conversion was mainly done through the sed command line
```
s/gcm_decrypt_and_verify:\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):
\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\):\([^:]*\)/auth_crypt_tv:
\1:\2:\4:\5:\3:\7:\8:\9/
```
Clarified and made more coherent the parameter validation feature, it's scope
and what has changed. Added version 2.14.1 to the history which was released on
a branch.
The calls to cipher_finish didn't actually do anything:
- the cipher mode is always ECB
- in that case cipher_finish() only sets *olen to zero, and returns either 0
or an error depending on whether there was pending data
- olen is a local variable in the caller, so setting it to zero right before
returning is not essential
- the return value of cipher_finis() was not checked by the caller so that's
not useful either
- the cipher layer does not have ALT implementations so the behaviour
described above is unconditional on ALT implementations (in particular,
cipher_finish() can't be useful to hardware as (with ECB) it doesn't call any
functions from lower-level modules that could release resources for example)
Since the calls are causing issues with parameter validation, and were no
serving any functional purpose, it's simpler to just remove them.
Somehow, mbedtls_sha256_ret() is defined even if MBEDTLS_SHA256_ALT
is set, and it is using SHA256_VALIDATE_RET. The documentation should
be enhanced to indicate that MBEDTLS_SHA256_ALT does _not_ replace
the entire module, but only the core SHA-256 functions.
Somehow, mbedtls_sha512_ret() is defined even if MBEDTLS_SHA512_ALT
is set, and it is using SHA512_VALIDATE_RET. The documentation should
be enhanced to indicate that MBEDTLS_SHA512_ALT does _not_ replace
the entire module, but only the core SHA-512 functions.
Somehow, mbedtls_sha1_ret() is defined even if MBEDTLS_SHA1_ALT
is set, and it is using SHA1_VALIDATE_RET. The documentation should
be enhanced to indicate that MBEDTLS_SHA1_ALT does _not_ replace
the entire module, but only the core SHA-1 functions.
