Change the way some lines are wrapped to cut at a more logical place.
This commit mainly rewrites multi-line calls to TEST_EQUAL, and also a
few calls to PSA_ASSERT.
This commit is the result of the following command, followed by
reindenting (but not wrapping lines):
perl -00 -i -pe 's/^( *)TEST_ASSERT\(([^;=]*)(?: |\n *)==([^;=]*)\);$/${1}TEST_EQUAL($2,$3);/gm' tests/suites/test_suite_psa_*.function
This commit is the result of the following command, followed by
reindenting (but not wrapping lines):
perl -00 -i -pe 's/^( *)TEST_ASSERT\(([^;=]*)(?: |\n *)==\s*PSA_SUCCESS\s*\);$/${1}PSA_ASSERT($2 );/gm' tests/suites/test_suite_psa_*.function
Cause a compilation error on ARRAY_LENGTH(p) where p is a pointer as
opposed to an array. This only works under GCC and compatible
compilers such as Clang. On other compilers, ARRAY_LENGTH works but
doesn't check the type of its argument.
Clarified and made more coherent the parameter validation feature, it's scope
and what has changed. Added version 2.14.1 to the history which was released on
a branch.
The calls to cipher_finish didn't actually do anything:
- the cipher mode is always ECB
- in that case cipher_finish() only sets *olen to zero, and returns either 0
or an error depending on whether there was pending data
- olen is a local variable in the caller, so setting it to zero right before
returning is not essential
- the return value of cipher_finis() was not checked by the caller so that's
not useful either
- the cipher layer does not have ALT implementations so the behaviour
described above is unconditional on ALT implementations (in particular,
cipher_finish() can't be useful to hardware as (with ECB) it doesn't call any
functions from lower-level modules that could release resources for example)
Since the calls are causing issues with parameter validation, and were no
serving any functional purpose, it's simpler to just remove them.
Somehow, mbedtls_sha256_ret() is defined even if MBEDTLS_SHA256_ALT
is set, and it is using SHA256_VALIDATE_RET. The documentation should
be enhanced to indicate that MBEDTLS_SHA256_ALT does _not_ replace
the entire module, but only the core SHA-256 functions.
Somehow, mbedtls_sha512_ret() is defined even if MBEDTLS_SHA512_ALT
is set, and it is using SHA512_VALIDATE_RET. The documentation should
be enhanced to indicate that MBEDTLS_SHA512_ALT does _not_ replace
the entire module, but only the core SHA-512 functions.
Somehow, mbedtls_sha1_ret() is defined even if MBEDTLS_SHA1_ALT
is set, and it is using SHA1_VALIDATE_RET. The documentation should
be enhanced to indicate that MBEDTLS_SHA1_ALT does _not_ replace
the entire module, but only the core SHA-1 functions.
