On space-constrained platforms, it is a useful configuration to be able
to import/export and perform RSA key pair operations, but to exclude RSA
key generation, potentially saving flash space. It is not possible to
express this with the PSA_WANT_ configuration system at the present
time. However, in previous versions of Mbed TLS (v2.24.0 and earlier) it
was possible to configure a software PSA implementation which was
capable of making RSA signatures but not capable of generating RSA keys.
To do this, one unset MBEDTLS_GENPRIME.
Since the addition of MBEDTLS_PSA_BUILTIN_KEY_TYPE_RSA_KEY_PAIR, this
expressivity was lost. Expressing that you wanted to work with RSA key
pairs forced you to include the ability to generate key pairs as well.
Change psa_crypto_rsa.c to only call mbedtls_rsa_gen_key() if
MBEDTLS_GENPRIME is also set. This restores the configuration behavior
present in Mbed TLS v2.24.0 and earlier versions.
It left as a future exercise to add the ability to PSA to be able to
express a desire for a software or accelerator configuration that
includes RSA key pair operations, like signature, but excludes key pair
generation.
Without this change, linker errors will occur when attempts to call,
which doesn't exist when MBEDTLS_GENPRIME is unset.
psa_crypto_rsa.c.obj: in function `rsa_generate_key':
psa_crypto_rsa.c:320: undefined reference to `mbedtls_rsa_gen_key'
Fixes#4512
Signed-off-by: Jaeden Amero <jaeden.amero@arm.com>
The test "PSA generate key: RSA, 1024 bits, good, encrypt (OAEP
SHA-256)" had a dependency on MBEDTLS_GENPRIME, but this was not listed
in the dependencies. Add MBEDTLS_GENPRIME to the test's dependencies to
ensure it has what it needs to run.
Signed-off-by: Jaeden Amero <jaeden.amero@arm.com>
TLS code specific to SHA-384 was gated on MBEDTLS_SHA512_C. But SHA-384 also
requires that MBEDTLS_SHA512_NO_SHA384 is not defined. This lead to dead
code in TLS when MBEDTLS_SHA512_C and MBEDTLS_SHA512_NO_SHA384 were both
defined (i.e. when SHA-512 was enabled but not SHA-384).
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
They depended on MBEDTLS_SHA512_C only. A check for !MBEDTLS_SHA512_NO_SHA384
was missing.
Fix#4499.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The sequence of calls starts-update-starts-update-finish is not a
guaranteed valid way to abort an operation and start a new one. Our
software implementation just happens to support it, but alt
implementations may very well not support it.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Session-ID based session resumption requires that the resumed session
is consistent with the client's ClientHello in terms of choice of
ciphersuite and choice of compression.
This check was previously assumed to be performed in the session cache
implementation, which seems wrong: The session cache should be an id-based
lookup only, and protocol specific checks should be left to Mbed TLS.
This commit
- adds an explicit ciphersuite and compression consistency check after
the SSL session cache has been queried
- removes the ciphersuite and compression consistency check from
Mbed TLS' session cache reference implementation.
Don't use ssl_check_xxx() for functions with void return
Signed-off-by: Hanno Becker <hanno.becker@arm.com>
Fix a pointer mismatch when int32_t is not int, for example on Cortex-M where
in32_t is long int. Fix#4530
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Prepare to isolate the Montgomery and short Weierstrass
implementations of mbedtls_ecp_gen_privkey into their own function.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
A previous fix in d596ca8a1e worked with
beta versions of GCC 11, but not with the final 11.1 release.
This time, just disable the warning locally.
Fix#4130
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Zephyr's native posix port define _POSIX_C_SOURCE with a higher value
during the build, so when mbedTLS defines it with a different value
breaks the build.
As Zephyr is already defining a higher value is guaranteed that mbedTLS
required features will be available. So, just define it in case it was
not defined before.
[taken from Zephyr mbedtls module:
76dcd6eeca]
Signed-off-by: Flavio Ceolin <flavio.ceolin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>
What matters is that we validate that test data is not removed. Keeping the
test data is the most obvious way, but not the only way.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The import-and-save and load-and-check parts of the tests don't have to be
actually the same test cases.
Introduce the terms “forward compatibility” and “backward compatibility” and
relate them to import-and-save and load-and-check actions.
These are clarifications of intent that do not represent an intended change
in the strategy or intended coverage.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
