Add test cases validating that if a stored key only had the hash policy,
then after loading it psa_get_key_attributes reports that it also has the
message policy, and the key can be used with message functions.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
Remove late binding of iterators to enable the creation of an object
with an actual state of a variable.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
According to the PSA specification the PSA_USAGE_SIGN_HASH has the
permission to sign a message as PSA_USAGE_SIGN_MESSAGE. Similarly the
PSA_USAGE_VERIFY_HASH has the permission to verify a message as
PSA_USAGE_VERIFY_MESSAGE. These permission will also be present when
the application queries the usage flags of the key.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
Introduce psa_mac_compute_internal with an
additional `is_sign` parameter compared to
the psa_mac_compute API. The intent is to
call psa_mac_compute_internal() from
psa_mac_verify() as well to compute the
message MAC.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Re-organize psa_mac_setup() to prepare the move
to a dedicated function of the additional checks
on the algorithm and the key attributes done by
this function. We want to move those checks in
a dedicated function to be able to do them
without duplicating them in psa_mac_compute().
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Tests for psa_mac_compute and psa_mac_verify functions.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
Implement one-shot MAC APIs, psa_mac_compute and psa_mac_verify, introduced in PSA Crypto API 1.0.
Signed-off-by: gabor-mezei-arm <gabor.mezei@arm.com>
Remove a case that cannot be triggered as PSA_ALG_SIGN_GET_HASH always
returns 0 for raw algorithms.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Hash and sign algorithms require the alignment of the input length with
the hash length at verification as well not just when signing.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
The psa_verify_hash() is the pre-hashed version of the API and supposed
to work on hashes generated by the user. There were tests passing that
were getting "hashes" of sizes different from the expected.
Transform these into properly failing tests.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
PSA Crypto always passed MBEDTLS_MD_NONE to Mbed TLS, which worked well
as Mbed TLS does not use this parameter for anything beyond determining
the input lengths.
Some alternative implementations however check the consistency of the
algorithm used for pre-hash and for other uses in verification (verify
operation and mask generation) and fail if they don't match. This makes
all such verifications fail.
Furthermore, the PSA Crypto API mandates that the pre-hash and internal
uses are aligned as well.
Fixes#3990.
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
Hashes used in RSA-PSS encoding (EMSA-PSS-ENCODE, see §9.1.1 in RFC
8017):
- H1: Hashing the message (step 2)
- H2: Hashing in the salt (step 6)
- H3: Mask generation function (step 9)
According to the standard:
- H1 and H2 MUST be done by the same hash function
- H3 is RECOMMENDED to be the same as the hash used for H1 and H2.
According to the implementation:
- H1 happens outside of the function call. It might or might not happen
and the implementation might or might not be aware of the hash used.
- H2 happens inside the function call, consistency with H1 is not
enforced and might not even be possible to detect.
- H3 is done with the same hash as H2 (with the exception of
mbedtls_rsassa_pss_verify_ext(), which takes a dedicated parameter for
the hash used in the MGF).
Issues with the documentation:
- The comments weren't always clear about the three hashes involved and
often only mentioned two of them (which two varied from function to
function).
- The documentation was giving the impression that the standard
recommends aligning H2 and H1 (which is not a recommendation but a
must).
Signed-off-by: Janos Follath <janos.follath@arm.com>
The loop exits early iff there is a nonzero limb, so i==0 means that
all limbs are 0, whether the number of limbs is 0 or not.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Fix a bug introduced in "Fix multiplication producing a negative zero" that
caused the sign to be forced to +1 when A > 0, B < 0 and B's low-order limb
is 0.
Add a non-regression test. More generally, systematically test combinations
of leading zeros, trailing zeros and signs.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
