The function mbedtls_mpi_sub_abs first checked that A >= B and then
performed the subtraction, relying on the fact that A >= B to
guarantee that the carry propagation would stop, and not taking
advantage of the fact that the carry when subtracting two numbers can
only be 0 or 1. This made the carry propagation code a little hard to
follow.
Write an ad hoc loop for the carry propagation, checking the size of
the result. This makes termination obvious.
The initial check that A >= B is no longer needed, since the function
now checks that the carry propagation terminates, which is equivalent.
This is a slight performance gain.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
There was some confusion during review about when A->p[n] could be
nonzero. In fact, there is no need to set A->p[n]: only the
intermediate result d might need to extend to n+1 limbs, not the final
result A. So never access A->p[n]. Rework the explanation of the
calculation in a way that should be easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The function mpi_sub_hlp had confusing semantics: although it took a
size parameter, it accessed the limb array d beyond this size, to
propagate the carry. This made the function difficult to understand
and analyze, with a potential buffer overflow if misused (not enough
room to propagate the carry).
Change the function so that it only performs the subtraction within
the specified number of limbs, and returns the carry.
Move the carry propagation out of mpi_sub_hlp and into its caller
mbedtls_mpi_sub_abs. This makes the code of subtraction very slightly
less neat, but not significantly different.
In the one other place where mpi_sub_hlp is used, namely mpi_montmul,
this is a net win because the carry is potentially sensitive data and
the function carefully arranges to not have to propagate it.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
mpi_sub_hlp performs a subtraction A - B, but took parameters in the
order (B, A). Swap the parameters so that they match the usual
mathematical syntax.
This has the additional benefit of putting the output parameter (A)
first, which is the normal convention in this module.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Let code analyzers know that this is deliberate. For example MSVC
warns about the conversion if it's implicit.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
In mpi_montmul, an auxiliary function for modular
exponentiation (mbedtls_mpi_mod_exp) that performs Montgomery
multiplication, the last step is a conditional subtraction to force
the result into the correct range. The current implementation uses a
branch and therefore may leak information about secret data to an
adversary who can observe what branch is taken through a side channel.
Avoid this potential leak by always doing the same subtraction and
doing a contant-trace conditional assignment to set the result.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Separate out a version of mpi_safe_cond_assign that works on
equal-sized limb arrays, without worrying about allocation sizes or
signs.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This reverts commit 2cc69fffcf.
A check was added in mpi_montmul because clang-analyzer warned about a
possibly null pointer. However this was a false positive. Recent
versions of clang-analyzer no longer emit a warning (3.6 does, 6
doesn't).
Incidentally, the size check was wrong: mpi_montmul needs
T->n >= 2 * (N->n + 1), not just T->n >= N->n + 1.
Given that this is an internal function which is only used from one
public function and in a tightly controlled way, remove both the null
check (which is of low value to begin with) and the size check (which
would be slightly more valuable, but was wrong anyway). This allows
the function not to need to return an error, which makes the source
code a little easier to read and makes the object code a little
smaller.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
When parsing a certificate with the basic constraints extension
the max_pathlen that was read from it was incremented regardless
of its value. However, if the max_pathlen is equal to INT_MAX (which
is highly unlikely), an undefined behaviour would occur.
This commit adds a check to ensure that such value is not accepted
as valid. Relevant tests for INT_MAX and INT_MAX-1 are also introduced.
Certificates added in this commit were generated using the
test_suite_x509write, function test_x509_crt_check. Input data taken
from the "Certificate write check Server1 SHA1" test case, so the generated
files are like the "server1.crt", but with the "is_ca" field set to 1 and
max_pathlen as described by the file name.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Kurek <andrzej.kurek@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Nowicki <piotr.nowicki@arm.com>
See the comments in the code for how an attack would go, and the ChangeLog
entry for an impact assessment. (For ECDSA, leaking a few bits of the scalar
over several signatures translates to full private key recovery using a
lattice attack.)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The current logging was sub-standard, in particular there was no trace
whatsoever of the HelloVerifyRequest being sent. Now it's being logged with
the usual levels: 4 for full content, 2 return of f_send, 1 decision about
sending it (or taking other branches in the same function) because that's the
same level as state changes in the handshake, and also same as the "possible
client reconnect" message" to which it's the logical continuation (what are we
doing about it?).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
In x509.c, the self-test code is dependent on MBEDTLS_CERTS_C and
MBEDTLS_SHA256_C being enabled. At some point in the recent past that dependency
was on MBEDTLS_SHA1_C but changed to SHA256, but the comment wasn't updated.
This commit updates the comment.
Signed-off-by: Simon Butcher <simon.butcher@arm.com>
Some code paths want to access members of the mbedtls_rsa_context structure.
We can only do that when using our own implementation, as otherwise we don't
know anything about that structure.
When parsing a PKCS#1 RSAPrivateKey structure, all parameters are always
present. After importing them, we need to call rsa_complete() for the sake of
alternative implementations. That function interprets zero as a signal for
"this parameter was not provided". As that's never the case, we mustn't pass
any zero value to that function, so we need to explicitly check for it.
This reverts commit 7550e857bf, reversing
changes made to d0c2575324.
stat() will never return S_IFLNK as the file type, as stat()
explicitly follows symlinks.
Fixes#3005.
If Y was constructed through functions in this module, then Y->n == 0
iff Y->p == NULL. However we do not prevent filling mpi structures
manually, and zero may be represented with n=0 and p a valid pointer.
Most of the code can cope with such a representation, but for the
source of mbedtls_mpi_copy, this would cause an integer underflow.
Changing the test for zero from Y->p==NULL to Y->n==0 causes this case
to work at no extra cost.
When mbedtls_x509_crt_parse_path() checks each object in the supplied path, it only processes regular files. This change makes it also accept a symlink to a file. Fixes#3005.
This was observed to be a problem on Fedora/CentOS/RHEL systems, where the ca-bundle in the default location is actually a symlink.
* origin/mbedtls-2.16:
Fix some pylint warnings
Enable more test cases without MBEDTLS_MEMORY_DEBUG
More accurate test case description
Clarify that the "FATAL" message is expected
Note that mbedtls_ctr_drbg_seed() must not be called twice
Fix CTR_DRBG benchmark
Changelog entry for xxx_drbg_set_entropy_len before xxx_drbg_seed
CTR_DRBG: support set_entropy_len() before seed()
CTR_DRBG: Don't use functions before they're defined
HMAC_DRBG: support set_entropy_len() before seed()
The functions mbedtls_ctr_drbg_random() and
mbedtls_ctr_drbg_random_with_add() could return 0 if an AES function
failed. This could only happen with alternative AES
implementations (the built-in implementation of the AES functions
involved never fail), typically due to a failure in a hardware
accelerator.
Bug reported and fix proposed by Johan Uppman Bruce and Christoffer
Lauri, Sectra.
In ssl_parse_hello_verify_request, we read 3 bytes (version and cookie
length) without checking that there are that many bytes left in
ssl->in_msg. This could potentially read from memory outside of the
ssl->receive buffer (which would be a remotely exploitable
crash).
In ssl_parse_hello_verify_request, we print cookie_len bytes without
checking that there are that many bytes left in ssl->in_msg. This
could potentially log data outside the received message (not a big
deal) and could potentially read from memory outside of the receive
buffer (which would be a remotely exploitable crash).
* restricted/pr/667: (24 commits)
Add ChangeLog entry
mpi_lt_mpi_ct: fix condition handling
mpi_lt_mpi_ct: Add further tests
mpi_lt_mpi_ct: Fix test numbering
mpi_lt_mpi_ct perform tests for both limb size
ct_lt_mpi_uint: cast the return value explicitely
mbedtls_mpi_lt_mpi_ct: add tests for 32 bit limbs
mbedtls_mpi_lt_mpi_ct: simplify condition
Rename variable for better readability
mbedtls_mpi_lt_mpi_ct: Improve documentation
Make mbedtls_mpi_lt_mpi_ct more portable
Bignum: Document assumptions about the sign field
Add more tests for mbedtls_mpi_lt_mpi_ct
mpi_lt_mpi_ct test: hardcode base 16
Document ct_lt_mpi_uint
mpi_lt_mpi_ct: make use of unsigned consistent
ct_lt_mpi_uint: make use of biL
Change mbedtls_mpi_cmp_mpi_ct to check less than
mbedtls_mpi_cmp_mpi_ct: remove multiplications
Remove excess vertical space
...
This issue has been reported by Tuba Yavuz, Farhaan Fowze, Ken (Yihang) Bai,
Grant Hernandez, and Kevin Butler (University of Florida) and
Dave Tian (Purdue University).
In AES encrypt and decrypt some variables were left on the stack. The value
of these variables can be used to recover the last round key. To follow best
practice and to limit the impact of buffer overread vulnerabilities (like
Heartbleed) we need to zeroize them before exiting the function.
In the case of *ret we might need to preserve a 0 value throughout the
loop and therefore we need an extra condition to protect it from being
overwritten.
The value of done is always 1 after *ret has been set and does not need
to be protected from overwriting. Therefore in this case the extra
condition can be removed.
