- it's 2020, there shouldn't be too many systems out there where SHA-1 is the
only available hash option, so its usefulness is limited
- OTOH testing configurations without SHA-2 reveal bugs that are not easy to
fix in a fully compatible way
So overall, the benefit/cost ratio is not good enough to justify keeping SHA-1
as a fallback option here.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The previous commit introduced a potential memory overread by reading
secret_len bytes from secret->p, while the is no guarantee that secret has
enough limbs for that.
Fix that by using an intermediate buffer and mpi_write_binary().
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The dependency on a DRBG module was perhaps a bit strict for LTS branches, so
let's have an option that works with no DRBG when at least one SHA module is
present.
This changes the internal API of ecp_drbg_seed() by adding the size of the
MPI as a parameter. Re-computing the size from the number of limbs doesn't
work too well here as we're writing out to a fixed-size buffer and for some
curves (P-521) that would round up too much. Using mbedtls_mpi_get_len() is
not entirely satisfactory either as it would mean using a variable-length
encoding, with could open side channels.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
It results in smaller code than using CTR_DRBG (64 bytes smaller on ARMv6-M
with arm-none-eabi-gcc 7.3.1), so let's use this by default when both are
available.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
Unless MBEDTLS_ECP_NO_INTERNAL_RNG is defined, it's no longer possible for
f_rng to be NULL at the places that randomize coordinates.
Eliminate the NULL check in this case:
- it makes it clearer to reviewers that randomization always happens (unless
the user opted out at compile time)
- a NULL check in a place where it's easy to prove the value is never NULL
might upset or confuse static analyzers (including humans)
- removing the check saves a bit of code size
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The case of MBEDTLS_ECP_RESTARTABLE isn't handled correctly yet: in that case
the DRBG instance should persist when resuming the operation. This will be
addressed in the next commit.
When both CTR_DRBG and HMAC_DRBG are available, CTR_DRBG is preferred since
both are suitable but CTR_DRBG tends to be faster and I needed a tie-breaker.
There are currently three possible cases to test:
- NO_INTERNAL_RNG is set -> tested in test_ecp_no_internal_rng
- it's unset and CTR_DRBG is available -> tested in the default config
- it's unset and CTR_DRBG is disabled -> tested in
test_ecp_internal_rng_no_ctr_drbg
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
No effect so far, except on dependency checking, as the feature it's meant to
disable isn't implemented yet (so the descriptions in config.h and the
ChangeLog entry are anticipation for now).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
This commit adds an error condition for bad user configurations
and updates the number of SSL module errors in error.h.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
This commit uses the previously defined macro to uniformize
bounds checks in several places. It also adds bounds checks to
the ClientHello writing function that were previously missing.
Also, the functions adding extensions to the ClientHello message
can now fail if the buffer is too small or a different error
condition occurs, and moreover they take an additional buffer
end parameter to free them from the assumption that one is
writing to the default output buffer.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
The ssl_cli.c:ssl_write_supported_elliptic_curves_ext()
function is compiled only if MBEDTLS_ECDH_C, MBEDTLS_ECDSA_C
or MBEDTLS_KEY_EXCHANGE_ECJPAKE_ENABLED is defined which
implies that MBEDTLS_ECP_C is defined. Thus remove the
precompiler conditions on MBEDTLS_ECP_C in its code.
Signed-off-by: Ronald Cron <ronald.cron@arm.com>
The function mbedtls_mpi_sub_abs first checked that A >= B and then
performed the subtraction, relying on the fact that A >= B to
guarantee that the carry propagation would stop, and not taking
advantage of the fact that the carry when subtracting two numbers can
only be 0 or 1. This made the carry propagation code a little hard to
follow.
Write an ad hoc loop for the carry propagation, checking the size of
the result. This makes termination obvious.
The initial check that A >= B is no longer needed, since the function
now checks that the carry propagation terminates, which is equivalent.
This is a slight performance gain.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
There was some confusion during review about when A->p[n] could be
nonzero. In fact, there is no need to set A->p[n]: only the
intermediate result d might need to extend to n+1 limbs, not the final
result A. So never access A->p[n]. Rework the explanation of the
calculation in a way that should be easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
The function mpi_sub_hlp had confusing semantics: although it took a
size parameter, it accessed the limb array d beyond this size, to
propagate the carry. This made the function difficult to understand
and analyze, with a potential buffer overflow if misused (not enough
room to propagate the carry).
Change the function so that it only performs the subtraction within
the specified number of limbs, and returns the carry.
Move the carry propagation out of mpi_sub_hlp and into its caller
mbedtls_mpi_sub_abs. This makes the code of subtraction very slightly
less neat, but not significantly different.
In the one other place where mpi_sub_hlp is used, namely mpi_montmul,
this is a net win because the carry is potentially sensitive data and
the function carefully arranges to not have to propagate it.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
mpi_sub_hlp performs a subtraction A - B, but took parameters in the
order (B, A). Swap the parameters so that they match the usual
mathematical syntax.
This has the additional benefit of putting the output parameter (A)
first, which is the normal convention in this module.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Let code analyzers know that this is deliberate. For example MSVC
warns about the conversion if it's implicit.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
In mpi_montmul, an auxiliary function for modular
exponentiation (mbedtls_mpi_mod_exp) that performs Montgomery
multiplication, the last step is a conditional subtraction to force
the result into the correct range. The current implementation uses a
branch and therefore may leak information about secret data to an
adversary who can observe what branch is taken through a side channel.
Avoid this potential leak by always doing the same subtraction and
doing a contant-trace conditional assignment to set the result.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
Separate out a version of mpi_safe_cond_assign that works on
equal-sized limb arrays, without worrying about allocation sizes or
signs.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
This reverts commit 2cc69fffcf.
A check was added in mpi_montmul because clang-analyzer warned about a
possibly null pointer. However this was a false positive. Recent
versions of clang-analyzer no longer emit a warning (3.6 does, 6
doesn't).
Incidentally, the size check was wrong: mpi_montmul needs
T->n >= 2 * (N->n + 1), not just T->n >= N->n + 1.
Given that this is an internal function which is only used from one
public function and in a tightly controlled way, remove both the null
check (which is of low value to begin with) and the size check (which
would be slightly more valuable, but was wrong anyway). This allows
the function not to need to return an error, which makes the source
code a little easier to read and makes the object code a little
smaller.
Signed-off-by: Gilles Peskine <Gilles.Peskine@arm.com>
When parsing a certificate with the basic constraints extension
the max_pathlen that was read from it was incremented regardless
of its value. However, if the max_pathlen is equal to INT_MAX (which
is highly unlikely), an undefined behaviour would occur.
This commit adds a check to ensure that such value is not accepted
as valid. Relevant tests for INT_MAX and INT_MAX-1 are also introduced.
Certificates added in this commit were generated using the
test_suite_x509write, function test_x509_crt_check. Input data taken
from the "Certificate write check Server1 SHA1" test case, so the generated
files are like the "server1.crt", but with the "is_ca" field set to 1 and
max_pathlen as described by the file name.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Kurek <andrzej.kurek@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Piotr Nowicki <piotr.nowicki@arm.com>
See the comments in the code for how an attack would go, and the ChangeLog
entry for an impact assessment. (For ECDSA, leaking a few bits of the scalar
over several signatures translates to full private key recovery using a
lattice attack.)
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
We keep track of the current epoch and record sequence number in out_ctr,
which was overwritten when writing the record containing the
HelloVerifyRequest starting from out_buf. We can avoid that by only using the
rest of the buffer.
Using MBEDTLS_SSL_MAX_CONTENT_LEN as the buffer size is still correct, as it
was a pretty conservative value when starting from out_buf.
Note: this bug was also fixed unknowingly in 2.13 by introducing a new buffer
that holds the current value of the sequence number (including epoch), while
working on datagram packing: 198594709b
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
The current logging was sub-standard, in particular there was no trace
whatsoever of the HelloVerifyRequest being sent. Now it's being logged with
the usual levels: 4 for full content, 2 return of f_send, 1 decision about
sending it (or taking other branches in the same function) because that's the
same level as state changes in the handshake, and also same as the "possible
client reconnect" message" to which it's the logical continuation (what are we
doing about it?).
Signed-off-by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <manuel.pegourie-gonnard@arm.com>
In x509.c, the self-test code is dependent on MBEDTLS_CERTS_C and
MBEDTLS_SHA256_C being enabled. At some point in the recent past that dependency
was on MBEDTLS_SHA1_C but changed to SHA256, but the comment wasn't updated.
This commit updates the comment.
Signed-off-by: Simon Butcher <simon.butcher@arm.com>
Some code paths want to access members of the mbedtls_rsa_context structure.
We can only do that when using our own implementation, as otherwise we don't
know anything about that structure.
When parsing a PKCS#1 RSAPrivateKey structure, all parameters are always
present. After importing them, we need to call rsa_complete() for the sake of
alternative implementations. That function interprets zero as a signal for
"this parameter was not provided". As that's never the case, we mustn't pass
any zero value to that function, so we need to explicitly check for it.
